IANS Review: Spencer’ surpasses ‘Diana’ of 2013. (IANS Rating: ***1/2).

By Troy RibeirFilm: "Spencer" (Showing In Theatres).Duration: 111 minutes.

Director: Pablo Larrain.Sally Hawkins and Kristen Stewart starIANS Rating: 1/2 "Spencer" was written in 1991 and is an eerie reimagining the three days of Christmas that Princess Diana spent at Sandringham Estate.This six-storey mansion, which stands on over 20,000 acres, sits off the Norfolk Coast.The biographical movie about Princess Diana.

This film, which is described as "a fable from true tragedy," portrays Princess Diana in a psychological drama that features dream sequences and internal and external pain.It also contains metaphor-laden scenes and dialogues.

Diana, sporting her blonde hair in a bob and driving alone her green car through the country lost in her area of childhood as a neighbour to the royals, begins the story.We see that Diana is now on her own and it is not an accident.

She has also lost some of herself as she tries to live up the expectations she set for herself.Diana was once on royal ground with her sons William and Harry (Freddie Spry).

Now she is in a loving marriage to Prince Charles (Jack Farthing) who betrays her openly.Diana feels effectively in prison and begins to feel depressed.

She finds Anne Boleyns biography (Amy Manson), the woman accused of adultery, beheaded to allow her husband to marry again.She feels like the Gothic palace walls are closing in on herself as she is deprived of privacy both outside and within the estate.

She loosens control of reality and can only escape to save her self.Directors view is more than a simple interpretation of Princess Dianas dissatisfaction with royal holiday traditions.

The director shows Diana in her weakest moments, when she is most self-destructive and nasty.The world loves her as the Queen of Hearts or Princess Peoples People.

She is instead prickly and self-absorbed, self-pitying and spoiled.However, while we feel the cold in every frame of her, it is easy to warm up to her when she is around her children, who exude maternal love.

The audience is kept uneasy by the mixing of real and imaginary herguish.These dialogues -- "Beauty, not beauty, is clothes", "Theres no future here but past and present" and “I watch to ensure others dont see” -- feel very on-the-face.

These dialogues feel more like the declarations of an era that define depth and sharpness.Kristen Stewart is a convincing portrayal of the moody Diana.

With her pitying, doe-eyed eyes and little girl voice, she does her best, but it is not a convincing impression.This is a more modern interpretation of the classic role.

It brings layers of human complexity to the figure that, in spite of all her myths, still stands tall in global consciousness.There are some moments you can overlook about her accent.

Sally Hawkins, Sean Harris and Timothy Spall all have supporting roles.Jack Farthing is a poor representation of Prince Charles.

Overall, Larrain’s film "Spencer" is more powerful than Oliver Hirshbiegel’s 2013 movie "Diana", starring Naomi Watts.tr/sr #IANS #Review #Spencer #surpasses #Diana.