Delhi HC to examine Google’s Advertising terms for legal remedies in India

New Delhi, March 29 : The Delhi High Court has said that it will examine whether the terms of Google’s advertising programme unjustly restricts advertisers from seeking legal remedies or opting for arbitration within India.

Justice Pratibha M.

Singh was hearing a plea filed by Startupwala Private Limited against Google India Private Limited, challenging the conditions under which their digital advertisements were disapproved or labelled as Limited.

Startupwala’s legal action, invoking Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, demands that Google India reinstate all the companys digital advertisements disapproved or marked as Limited in December 2023 and January 2024.

Additionally, it seeks to prevent Google from disapproving any remaining ads under the same classification.

ఆ ఓటీటీలో స్ట్రీమింగ్ కానున్న రాకింగ్ రాకేష్ కేసీఆర్.. ఇక్కడైనా హిట్టవుతుందా?...

The contention revolves around the disapproval of Startupwala’s advertisements based on Googles Government Documents and Official Services policy.

Advertisement

Startupwala argues against Clause 13 of the Advertisement Terms, which mandates arbitration in Santa Clara County, California, USA, claiming it effectively denies them the opportunity to pursue legal remedies in India.

Justice Singhs notice to Google calls for a thorough evaluation of whether such a clause truly inhibits Indian entities like Startupwala from accessing their legal rights or mandates that arbitration should occur within India.

Google has been directed to respond within two weeks, during which, it is ordered that advertisements currently not blocked and labelled ‘Eligible (limited)’ should not be altered or removed.

This order comes with the stipulation that the content of these advertisements remains unchanged until the next hearing.

వెన్నెల కిషోర్ తన ఇన్వెస్టిగేషన్ తో మెప్పించాడా? 'శ్రీకాకుళం షెర్లాక్ హోమ్స్' ఎలావుందంటే.....

"Since the Respondent is yet to file a reply and there are no reasons on record as to why any of these advertisements are disapproved or marked as Eligible (limited), the Court has considered the irreparable loss which can be caused to the petitioner and its business," the court noted.

Advertisement

"Hence, it is directed that those advertisements which have currently not been blocked and are labelled as Eligible (limited).

shall not be blocked or taken down till the next date of hearing," it added.

spr/kvd